Nature Vs Nurture Debate
In the nature Vs nurture debate it contrasts two important ways of explaining human growth and development, nature refers to an individual's innate qualities (nativism). Nature is your genes, the physical and personality traits determined by your genes stay the same irrespective of where you were born and raised, for example; biological and family factors. Whereas nurture refers to personal experiences (e.g. empiricism or behaviourism). Nature refers to your childhood, or how you were brought up. Someone could be born with genes to give them a normal height, but be malnourished in childhood, resulting in stunted growth and a failure to develop as expected, for example; social and environmental factors.
Richard Branson is an entrepreneur, an entrepreneur is defined as a person who attempts to profit by risk and initiative; Richard Branson has taken many risks and has been very successful. He has become a renowned name in the business world; many people didn't expect a dyslexic boy to become a 'leading world emperor'.
Branson is dyslexic and nearsighted; he wasn't seen as a very bright boy, his disabilities made it difficult for his teachers to recognise his aspirations and drive. He was educated at Scaitcliffe School until the age of thirteen which he almost failed, he then went on to attend Stowe school; still struggling Brandon dropped out at the age of 16. It wasn't until Branson became an adolescent that his abilities and talents became more obvious.
Individuals may have not of understood him or seen the possibility of him becoming a success. His family were well off and very intelligent, they have highly respectable and well paid jobs, this may have made Branson lose motivation to achieve and push him to, also he may have felt some pressure to live up to his parents expectations.
His ability to connect with people was not recognized until later years. On one of Branson's last days at school, his headmaster told him he would either end up in prison or become a millionaire.
D1 evaluate how nature and nurture may affect the physical, intellectual, emotional and social development of two stages of the development of an individual
1) You will then evaluate the possible effects of genetic inheritance and the environment discussing the role of nature and nurture in influencing development. It is very unlikely that you will be able to find any useful information about your person's genetics or indeed enough information about their environmental circumstances to make statements or judgements about the specific role of these factors in the person's life. Instead, you should discuss the broader issues associated with nature and nurture in the context of the person's life story.
You will need to include at least 2 theorists e.g. Harlow, Gessell, Bandura, Bowlby, Piaget, Erikson, Skinner
Possible effects of genetic inheritance in influencing development '
Natural influences on human growth and development include genetic factors and biological processes that affect the person from within. People who take an extreme nature viewpoint argue that we are pre-programmed by our genes and biological processes to develop and behave in certain ways. By contrast, nurture influences are non-biological, environmental factors that affect the person from outside. People who take an extreme nurture viewpoint argue that human beings are not programmed to develop in a specific way because we have free will, can make lifestyle choices and are influences by a complex range of psychological, social, geographic and economic factors.
He was born from an intelligent family, his father Edward James Branson, worked as a barrister, His mother, Eve Branson, was employed as a flight attendant. His grandfather, the Right Honorable Sir George Arthur Harwin Branson, was a judge of the High Court of Justice and a Privy Councilor. So he is expected to be born with the same intellectual capabilities of his family before him.
Jean Piaget (1896-1980) was a psychologist, he first put forward the theory that we are born with basic intellectual abilities which improve as we experience different stages of intellectual development during infancy, childhood and adolescence. Piaget's theory claims that cognitive development occurs when the child's brain has matured so that it is 'ready' for development. He argued that new information ad experiences are gradually assimilated into the child's existing thinking. When this happens the new experiences are accommodated by modifying existing thinking ' What Piaget is suggesting is that we are born with a certain intellectual ability but this ability grow and shapes through the influence of our environment. This is somewhat proven with Branson, as he is born from his family with their intellect, and it wasn't until much later on that his cognitive ability showed.
Possible effects of the environment in influencing development '
Nature and nurture influences on human growth and development can also be thought of as internal and external influences. Internal (nature) factors, such as genes, determine how a person grows and develops because they have a direct biological influence on the person. These internal nature-type influences tend to have their strongest impact on growth and development during infancy, adolescence and old age. Basic, biological processes cause irreversible physical changes to the human body during these life stages.
Teachers and other individuals (secondary socialisation) didn't expect much from Branson, this could have made him feel as though he wouldn't amount to anything, it could have made him lose confidence in himself and lose motivation. But what he learnt from his family, his parents in particular (primary socialisation) proved to be more dominant in shaping Branson during his development. Although he struggled in school this didn't mean he was not intelligent, he later on became successful even though he dropped out of school at an early age.
Branson's upbringing was very encouraging; his parents were behind him on everything he did,
Branson's parents were supportive of his endeavors from an early age. When 15-year-old Richard decided to breed budgies and persuaded his father to build a huge aviary, his father built it. This encouragement allowed Branson to feel capable of doing well and trying new things when it comes to careers and taking risks (this benefitted him later on in his working industry). The Branson family budget was fairly tight when Richard was growing up, his mother made ends meet by selling items she would make, if an item didn't sell, she tried something else. This played a role in the way Branson developed as this is the sort of work ethic he uses within his career; also living with a tight budget may have motivated him to want a better life for himself and for his family.
There is a rather well-known story about Branson's mum stopping the car on the way home from a shopping trip and telling him to find his own way home - about three miles through the countryside, and he was somewhere around five years old. She was punishing him for causing mischief in the back seat, but she was also teaching him a larger lesson about overcoming his disabling shyness and learning to ask others for directions. This can be seen as a very harsh thing to do, but in Branson's mother's eyes, she was preparing him for the future.
Erik Erikson (1902-94) was a theorist inspired by Freud's work, Erikson produced a theory of psychological development that as influenced the work of many psychologists, educations and health and social care practitioners. Erikson developed a theory of psychosexual development based on the ideas of Freud. He believed people experience several stages of psychosexual development over their lifetime and that social relationships play a significant part in this. Erikson rejected Freud's emphasis on unconscious forces and individual gratification. Instead he argued that an individual's development is motivated by a human need to be accepted by society and to live a meaningful life. Erikson developed his theory around the idea that people face and have to tackle a series of psychosocial crises in life. Each has a different social focus. ' Erikson's theory is very nurture based, he believed that experiences develop and shape an individual over a lifetime not so much their genetic inheritance. This is proven with Branson because no matter what he inherited the way he was brought up changed and had a big part in the way he developed into the successful man he is today.
Issues with nature and nurture of the person's life story '
Although the internal environment (nature) is an important influence, the external environmental (nurture) influences, on the other hand, have a less direct effect on human growth and development. They tend to shape rather than determine a person's emotional, social and intellectual development and life course. External environmental influences are important, for example, in promoting social development during childhood and adolescence and emotional development during infancy and adolescence. There seem to be more effects of environmental influences, especially for Branson; making it almost completely outweigh the effects of genetic inheritance. However; this doesn't mean that nature doesn't play a role in how an individual develops. For example; Branson was born with dyslexia and he was nearsighted, but his environment (such as his parents), shaped him into becoming a confident, motivated individual who was fully capable of doing well.
Source: Essay UK - http://www.essay.uk.com/free-essays/education/nature-nurture-debate.php
Not what you're looking for?
If this essay isn't quite what you're looking for, why not order your own custom Education essay, dissertation or piece of coursework that answers your exact question? There are UK writers just like me on hand, waiting to help you. Each of us is qualified to a high level in our area of expertise, and we can write you a fully researched, fully referenced complete original answer to your essay question. Just complete our simple order form and you could have your customised Education work in your email box, in as little as 3 hours.
Free Nature vs. Nurture Essay
- Length: 645 words (1.8 double-spaced pages)
- Rating: Excellent
The Nature vs. Nurture Debate
Being yourself, being who you are. When you hear those two lines you may think they mean the same thing but do they? Think about it, you were born into this world a tiny little baby with no ideas, or preferences, but as you grew you developed a personal identity, but did it really develop or was it in you to begin with. Such questions are what leads to the great debate of nature vs nurture. If you believe you were born already with a personality, then you take the side of nature. on the other hand if you believe that your personality developed based on influences in your life beginning when you were a child then you believe in nurture. Two totally different theories, both which are believed to make us who we are.
Nature, the more scientific theory of the two, is the belief that hereditary traits found in our genes make us who we are, believable but not very convincing when we consider the theory of nurture. Human beings learn new things everyday, as soon as we come in to the world, our learning process begins. As a newborn baby, we slowly learn and adapt in order to survive in a new environment which is unlike that of our mothers wombs, our first environment in which we first grew, adapted to and developed in. The home environment parents and siblings play a huge role in determining personality. Influences from outside the family are also very important to the development of ones personality. But everything starts at home.
One can't enjoy snowboarding or claim to like it, until one tries it, without the experience its impossible to say you enjoyed it. Correct? Or do you think its already embedded in you're genes that you'll like snowboarding. Unlikely right? Exactly, experiences and influences are what make us who we are. On the other hand think about it, what if you went snowboarding for the first time and broke your arm; deciding then that you hated snowboarding. Well then it couldn't have been embedded in your genes that you'd like it.
Scientists make a good point about genes but I believe physical aspects come through genetics, but that personality development is shaped based solely on how a person has been nurtured through their lives. All children are bad at one time in their lives; consider this, a 4 year old girl throws a book at her brother, and is punished she is put in the corner.
How to Cite this Page
|Free Nature vs. Nurture Essay - What is inborn and what is learned. The discussion as to whether nature or nurture were the driving force shaping our cognitive abilities, was for a long time considered interminable. In the 18th century, Locke and the English empiricists claimed that individuals were born with a tabula rasa and only experience could establish mind, consciousness and the self. On the continent, Leibniz envisaged the self as a monad carrying with it some knowledge of a basic understanding of the world. Until the 1960s, this dispute was still very vivid in the behavioral sciences: B.... [tags: essays research papers]||484 words|
|Free Nature vs. Nurture Essay - Nature vs Nurture The exponential growth of scientific and biological knowledge over time has facilitated the genesis of radical fields of specialization, namely biological determinism, sociobiology and eugenics, just to mention a few. The common thread between these fields is this- their proponents collectively postulate that all human traits, including weight, strength, intelligence, aspects of personality such as temperament (aggression for example), criminality and morality, are ultimately determined by the information encoded in DNA.... [tags: Biology Genes Science Essays]||535 words|
| Nature vs Nurture: Genetics vs Environment Essay - The classic debated topic of Nature versus Nurture has been and will always be a quarrelsome subject in the scientific world. Meaning, the issue of the level to which environment and heredity sway behavior and development in a person. Nature can be defined as, behaviors due to heredity. This means the behaviors is based on the inherited makeup of an individual and is an influence of the growth and development of that individuals’ all through life. On the other hand nurture is causes of behaviors that are environmental.... [tags: child development, psychology]|
:: 2 Works Cited
|Nature vs Nurture Debate Essay - Nature vs Nurture Debate Nature versus Nurture is the issue of the degree to which environment and heredity influence behavior and development. In this issue nature can be defined as, behaviors due to heredity. Which means behaviors are based on the genetic makeup of an individual and is an influence of the individuals' growth and development throughout life. On the other hand nurture are causes of behaviors that are environmental. Which means the influence is from, parents, siblings, family, friends and all other experiences to which the individual is exposed to.... [tags: Socialization Genes Science Nature Essays]||454 words|
|Examples of Evil in Humans Essay - “In the long run, we shape our lives, and we shape ourselves. The process never ends until we die. And the choices we make are ultimately our own responsibility.” (Eleanor Roosevelt). This is just one of the infinite examples of how human nature has been explored by so many different people. Each and every human is born with the capability of making their own choices. The decisions that they will make in the future will determine how evil they are viewed by others. Although one’s nature and nurture do affect their life, it is their own free will that determines whether or not they are evil.... [tags: nature vs nurture]||791 words|
| Nature vs. Nurture: Which is the Origin of Virtue? Essay - A classic debated topic of nurture versus nature has been and always will be an argumentative subject in the scientific world. Some psychologists and scientists believe that one’s behavioral aspects originate only from the environmental factors of one’s upbringing, while other opposing specialists argue the outlook in science that agrees with the naturalist idea. The concept of naturalistic ideas supports that one’s genetic makeup, inherited from one’s parents, is the sole determining factor in one’s behavioral characteristics.... [tags: child development, psychology]|
:: 4 Works Cited
| Nature v. Nurture in Mark Twain's Pudd'nhead Wilson and Those Extraordinary Twins - Nature v. Nurture in Mark Twain's Pudd'nhead Wilson and Those Extraordinary Twins What makes a person who they are is a difficult dilemma. Mark Twain's novel, "Pudd'nhead Wilson and Those Extraordinary Twins" is a critical analysis of how nature and nurture can cultivate emotions and free will, which in turn affects the life of individuals. "Twain's faltering sense of direction began about slavery, moral decay, and deceptive realities (Kaplan 314). The debate of `nature versus nurture' has been one of the most intriguing scientific and cultural issues for most of the twentieth century, in determining the behavioral aspects of human beings.... [tags: American Literature]|
:: 11 Works Cited
| Behavior: Nature vs. Nurture Essay - For centuries psychologists have argued over which plays the larger role in child development, heredity or environment. One of the first theories was proposed in the seventeenth century by the British philosopher John Locke. Locke believed that a child was born with an empty mind, tabula rasa (meaning "blank slate") and that everything the child learns comes from experience, nothing is established beforehand. Years later, Charles Darwin brought forth his theory of evolution, which led to a return of the hereditarian viewpoint.... [tags: genetics vs environment]|
:: 20 Works Cited
| Essay on Nature vs. Nurture - Nature vs. Nurture The human brain is not an empty vessel — right from the start it is packed with knowledge, some of which is built into every structure. A newborn baby just knows, for instance, that crying will bring other members of the species to its aid — it doesn't learn it or work it out. (Carter, R. Consciousness, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, p. 143) When Darwin's Theory of Evolution was published (See Darwin, C. (1859) On The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, Murray), proposing that simpler structures evolve into more complex organisms, the old certainties were threatened because the adaptations of creatures to their surroundings no longer needed to be explained in term... [tags: Science Biology Genetics Essays]|
:: 7 Works Cited
|Nature Vs Nurture Mario Puzo - Peter Cary Essay - Nature Vs. Nurture Mario Puzo’s, Omerta, reflects the theory of Thomas Hobbes In the state of nature, where the theory states, that in the state of nature“…no account of time; no arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.”(The Modern Age: Ideas In Western Civilization, Page 37-30) In Peter Cary’s, True History of the Kelly Gang, which conveys the theory of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, “Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains.... [tags: essays research papers]||2737 words|
Nature Vs Debate Home Environment Great Debate Scientific Theory Enviroment Snowboarding Personal Identity Siblings Preferences
Of course she doesn't like being made to stay in the corner but she should be able to put two and two together and learn that throwing books is wrong. Circumstances like so represent to us how easily children learn and are influenced by other people. This shows us the process in which humans learn, bringing us back to the theory of nurture learning things is what makes people who they are.
As we grow older, we are projected to the outside world, media and friends bring us new theories, which can again change who we are. We may have been brought up being told by our parents that stealing was bad or that being an average weight was okay. But the media could easily change that belief, or friends could convince one that stealing is okay. This represents that humans are constantly changing and easily influenced. Proving that nothing about who we are is a fixed fact, the theory of nature doesn't work.
In conclusion, it's obvious that the theory of nurture makes more sense then that or nature. Without influences from the world around us where would we be. We'd lack all basic skill's, we'd be unable to talk, or walk, we'd be completely different people. One's personal identity must develop through the environment it is what makes us who we are.