Euthanasia Pros And Cons Essay

There have been so much different implementations made for our modern world recently, especially in the field of medicine. Time goes by, scientists develop more and more vaccines, drugs, treatment modalities caring for patients with various diagnosis. No wonder that nowadays doctors carry some specific procedures related to birth and death. For instance, with the help of a doctor people who are not able to have children get the opportunity to implant embryo to woman’s body artificially, thus, using medical instruments made special for such process. More and more people turn to medical workers in the matter of surrogate maternity. Medical science continues its development in cancer treatment, producing new safe preparations and chemo methods of treatment. If you are interested in the topic of cancer diseases, be free to check cancer essays on our site.  

When it comes to death issue, medicine offers such a way of passing out which is referred to as physician assisted suicide or PAS, in short. People often confuse PAS with so-called euthanasia. The distinction between these two terms consists in the fact that PAS allows an ill person to choose his or her way to die. Euthanasia, in its turn, means that the doctor is supposed to provide the way of carrying the patient’s life away. There are still some investigations concerning active and passive euthanasia. Consequently, the first one, active, implies taking life of a patient purposefully. Passive euthanasia is referred to means of death when attending physician let a person die unintentionally, knowing the outcome but withholding it.

Essay on Assisted Suicide: “For” Factors

Even if you are totally against such specific form of suicide, do not rush to skip all “for” ideas. Among those willing to die in such a way the reasons for committing assisted suicide were the following:

  • Terminal diseases
  • Losing of self-sense
  • Intensive pain and suffering
  • Fear of becoming a burden for the relatives

When we talk about terminal illnesses, a person is most probably going to pass away. That is why they are called ‘terminals’, the grievous result is inevitable and any chances to save person’s life come to naught. Many terminals (patients suffering from severe incurable diseases) find in such a way their final release from pain and torments. It is even hard to imagine in what condition such a person may be. Some of them are ill to such an extent, or so to say, to the peak of a disease when they completely lose control and self-sense, thus, their body and mental abilities have already surrendered to the disease and nothing else can help. While first three points can play the role of causes to do this procedure, the last point is likely to fall into the “against” category. Before starting the new paragraph, check one more article regarding pros and cons, if you are interested in that way of data arrangement:

See also:

Points against aid-to-die process

As it was mentioned above, most people also fear that they may ruin lives of the closest people around them by, if one may put it that way, stealing their time while they make useless efforts to save them. As a small introduction to against factors of this suicide prevention essay, the general idea is that the ill cannot even imagine how ruining can be their death for relatives. If the person is close to the ill indeed, he or she will fight for life of the dying person till the end and their hope will stay in them till that frightful moment of death come. So this fear is baseless, on the one hand, although everything depends on the relationship between the patient and his or her relative. If you turn to other essays on euthanasia, you will see how much a family means in making a decision to die. At another point, the stress caused by death of a beloved person may provoke unwanted habits to appear. For example, it can be alcohol or drug abuse. Learn more from our essay on alcoholism and its consequences. In such a way, the cons of assisted suicide are the following:

  • Religious matter
  • Medical oath-breaking
  • Potential wrong diagnosis

First of all, some people consider assisted death as the crime committed against God. There is a general belief that only Gog is to decide whether a person should die or not. Doctors are not Gods. They say, if you are about to die, your time just has come, it is God’s will and this is what it should be. We can’t approve the statement that most people adhere to the attitude connected with religious matter, however, the supporters of that approach are set to it seriously and believe assisted death a sin and a crime against human nature. If you are preparing your paper on connection between religion and medicine, welcome to our site.

The oath which must be made by any medical worker proclaims that depriving a person of life is completely unacceptable. It also excludes any engagement in this kind of perishing. In other words, it is indicated in the oath that a doctor must never put poisonous substances causing fatal outcome. Therefore, a physician conducting the action of suicide breaks the Oath of Hippocrates and cannot call himself a physician anymore.

Another point noticed earlier in our essay involves the chance of making incorrect diagnosis. It is highly recommended to look closer to doctors and clinics in which a person undergoes treatment. Trust those doctors who have a lot of experience related particularly to terminal diseases under their belt. If you want to order an essay about doctors’ responsibilities, check our services page. A patient may make up in his or her head the most tragic picture of the disease pattern and go for euthanasia on the basis of this fear. The situation may go out of control and even one tiny mistake matters. If you are to write your own paper on various types of suicide or related topics, turn to the useful tips covered in this article:

Anyway, nowadays physician assisted death is prohibited in many countries. Only Belgium, Japan, Canada, Australia, the Netherlands and Switzerland allow doctors to assist in dying procedure. What is more interesting some people visit these countries in order to kill themselves because of their old age or under the pretext of ‘tiring of life.’ It is a pity that sometimes the reason for assisted suicide can be loneliness. We hope this essay helped you form your attitude to such specific topic. Get more captivating data from our essay online service.

Take a look at other topics:

The Pros and Cons of Euthanasia

  • :: 5 Works Cited
  • Length: 1265 words (3.6 double-spaced pages)
  • Rating: Excellent
Open Document

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - More ↓

“Euthanasia is defined as a deliberate act undertaken by one person with the intention of ending life of another person to relieve that person's suffering and where the act is the cause of death.”(Gupta, Bhatnagar and Mishra) Some define it as mercy killing. Euthanasia may be voluntary, non voluntary and involuntary. When terminally ill patient consented to end his or her life, it is called voluntary euthanasia. Non voluntary euthanasia occurs when the suffering person never consented nor requested to end a life. These patients are incompetent to decide because they are either minor, in a comatose stage or have mental conditions. Involuntary euthanasia is conducted when it is against the will of the patient (Gupta, Bhatnagar, Mishra). Euthanasia can be either passive or active. Passive euthanasia means life-sustaining treatments are withheld and nothing is done to keep the patient alive. Active euthanasia occurs when a physician do something by giving drugs or substances that ends a patient’s life. (Medical News Today)
Our values, opinions and beliefs depend on what culture, religion and the society we come from. People who are against view euthanasia as murder and that we must respect the value of life. Those who are in favor of euthanasia believe that doing such act eliminates the patient’s pain and suffering. Also, the right to die allows the person to die with dignity. Euthanasia may involve taking a human’s life, but not all forms of killing are wrong nor consider as murder. It depends on the underlying reasons and intentions. If you value a person’s life and the cause of death is for the patient’s benefit and not one’s personal interest, then euthanasia is permissible.
Pain and suffering is one reason people support euthanasia. “Pain-relief treatment could or even would shorten life”. (32) Yet, it is justified if the purpose is to comfort and relieve pain. Providing adequate amount of pain-relief treatment is also a way to extend life. It lessens the patient’s distress psychologically and physically. (Somerville) Going beyond the limit by overdosing the patient will poison the body and hastens death. In this case, it is unacceptable because its intention is to kill a person’s life and not to comfort.
An Interview by Lesley Martin is an example of euthanasia. Lesley is a registered nurse who relocated to New Zealand to take care of her mother, Joy. She was diagnosed with bowel cancer. After surgery, multiple interventions and other complications, her condition deteriorated and was dying.

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"The Pros and Cons of Euthanasia." 10 Mar 2018

LengthColor Rating 
Active Euthanasia Pros and Cons Essay - Abstract Euthanasia is a long debated topic, going back for decades in our country alone. Both sides of the topic have valid points morally and ethically. The Netherlands have had euthanasia laws in effect since 1973. America has very few states with legislation on the books: Oregon enacted in 1997, Washington 2008. Germany experimented with Active Euthanasia in the 1930’s, resulting in one of the most horrendous genocides in the past millennium. No where else do we have a cohort more at risk than the elderly, as they fall prey to the pressures of getting out of the way, and with a burgeoning population of baby boomers now becoming the elderly our system already strained now faces even mor...   [tags: Euthanasia Essays]
:: 9 Works Cited
1625 words
(4.6 pages)
Powerful Essays[preview]
Euthanasia: The Pros and Cons Essay - Euthanasia: The pros Anatomy Durkos Sarah Carter Jan 6, 2013 Over the years there has been a debate on whether euthanasia is a “humane” form of death. Some believe it isn't humane and others believe euthanasia is personal choice. Euthanasia is legal Australia and in four states in the united states. The legality of euthanasia is based on ethics primarily. I am pro euthanasia for many reasons; Euthanasia is cheaper, it ends the suffering of patients, and self determinism. Euthanasia is the assisted ending of a person life in response to pain and suffering....   [tags: voluntary, involuntary, pain]
:: 6 Works Cited
1289 words
(3.7 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Essay on The Pros and Cons of Euthanasia - Euthanasia, good or bad. In this following article I will be exploring euthanasia in more detail, the different Christian points of view, the strengths and weaknesses of the euthanasia argument and finally my point of view on euthanasia and why I believe this. First of all, what is euthanasia. It is something that not many people think about until they or a friend or family member is put in a position where they might actually have to consider it. Euthanasia, in the dictionary, simply is: the action of ending someone’s life in a painless way....   [tags: Pro Con Essays]1076 words
(3.1 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Essay on Arguments For And Against Euthanasia - Euthanasia is the practice of ending an individual's life in order to relieve them from an incurable disease or unbearable suffering. The term euthanasia is derived from the Greek word for "good death" and originally referred to as “intentional killing” ( Patelarou, Vardavas, Fioraki, Alegakis, Dafermou, & Ntzilepi, 2009). Euthanasia is a controversial topic which has raised a great deal of debate globally. Although euthanasia has received great exposure in the professional media, there are some sticky points that lack clarity and need to be addressed....   [tags: Euthanasia Pros and Cons]
:: 6 Works Cited
1956 words
(5.6 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Essay on Is Euthanasia Morally Acceptable? - Is it right to intentionally bring about the death of a person. The vast majority of people would instinctively answer this question “no,” unless it related to an act of war or perhaps self-defense. What if taking the life of the person would benefit that person by ending their suffering. Would it be morally acceptable to end their suffering. Questions like these are debated by those considering the morality of euthanasia, which is a very controversial topics in America. Euthanasia can be defined as “bringing about the death of another person to somehow benefit that person” (Pojman)....   [tags: Pros and Cons of Euthanasia]
:: 4 Works Cited
2344 words
(6.7 pages)
Research Papers[preview]
Essay on The Euthanasia Debate -    Euthanasia in this paper is examined in those countries which have legalized the procedure. And is found to be more of a burden than a blessing, indicating from the Dutch experience that it becomes an uncontrollable force once it has been legalized. There are welcome alternatives, for which proper training is necessary on the part of medical professionals. The original or first broad euthanasia program was for the purpose of "purifying" the German race under Hitler. It was a creation of German physicians, not of Hitler....   [tags: Pros and Cons of Euthanasia]
:: 10 Works Cited
2473 words
(7.1 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Essay on The Euthanasia Debate -      Qualifying euthanasia by calling it active or passive, direct or indirect, voluntary, non-voluntary, involuntary, or assisted suicide only confuses the picture. Euthanasia is when the doctor kills the patient. This simplification is made at the outset as an assist to the reader in more easily understanding the essential meaning without getting lost in hair-splitting verbiage. This approach does not compromise any of the excellent sources documenting this essay. The original or first broad euthanasia program was for the purpose of "purifying" the German race under Hitler....   [tags: Pros and Cons of Euthanasia]
:: 11 Works Cited
3048 words
(8.7 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
The Euthanasia Debate Essay - There are many different point of views on Euthanasia and whether or not it should be legalized. Many believe that since it is our bodies and our lives, we have the right to choose when we no longer want to live. On the other hand, there are great amounts of people who believe that euthanasia is considered murder and is not ethical. “One thing on which we all agree is that there is a true national crisis that surrounds the way Americans are dying” (Dr. Ira Byock.) The purpose of this paper is not to support either side, rather this paper will discuss what euthanasia really is, the past of euthanasia, and both the positive and negative sides of euthanasia....   [tags: Pros and Cons of Assisted Suicide]
:: 5 Works Cited
908 words
(2.6 pages)
Better Essays[preview]
The Euthanasia Debate Essay - Euthanasia is defined as the painless killing of a terminally ill patient by means of lethal injection by a doctor in a controlled medical environment. Similarly, physician assisted suicide (PAS) is when a patient requests a lethal prescription from a doctor or pharmacist to end their life before a fatal disease does. The two are akin to each other and are almost interchangeable in definitions. Being a highly controversial topic, there is a plethora of arguments surrounding PAS, all very emotionally driven and opinionated....   [tags: Pros and Cons of Assisted Suicide]
:: 4 Works Cited
1219 words
(3.5 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Euthanasia: Dying with Dignity Essay - Euthanasia: Dying with Dignity Someday, a loved one may be faced with tough times or a terrible tragedy that leaves them in pain and agony for the rest of their life. It may not happen today, tomorrow, or even next month, but it is always a good idea to have a well thought out plan. A terminal illness could strike at any minute such as Lou Gehrig’s disease, or a car accident could leave someone paralyzed and miserable for the rest of their life. Permitting euthanasia would give the people the right to die with dignity and give them the option to not have to go through the pain, suffering, and stressful effects of a terminal illness....   [tags: hippocratic oath, pain, agony, pros and cons]
:: 11 Works Cited
3332 words
(9.5 pages)
Research Papers[preview]

Joy asked Lesley to promise not to let her suffer for a long time. Before Joy’s death, Lesley administered 20 mg. After an hour, she gave her another 40 mg of morphine. The prescribed dosage was only 10 mg over 24 hours. “The purpose of the intervention was to save Joy from dying inch by inch for several days”. (218) Few hours later, Lesley finally fulfilled her promise by suffocating her mother with a pillow. Of the two attempts she made, Lesley was guilty of overdosing her mother with morphine. With her intention to end her mother’s life, Lesley Martin was convicted of attempted murder. (Mitchell)
Generally, the use of morphine is to relieve excessive pain. Based on my experiences, I have witnessed several people taking morphine who do not live long because of its side effects. Some physician may even increase the dosage for more comfort. However, this type of euthanasia is acceptable because its purpose is to comfort and alleviate the person’s suffering. Unlike Lesley, her emotions lead her misjudgment. Although Lesley is a nurse, it is beyond her scope of practice to increase the dosage. If the increased dosage was prescribed by the physician, then administering it will be considered legal. In this case, Lesley would not be charged of overdosing Joy with morphine. Rather she would be convicted of suffocating her mother.
Pro-euthanasia also argues that each person has the right to die and die with dignity. The underlying debate is the person’s quality of life. For an instance, a 95-year-old woman diagnosed with severe heart disease and advanced Alzheimer disease. Her condition is terminal and would more likely to suffer further heart attacks. She may even die within days or weeks. The only way to save her for the upcoming future attacks is cardio-pulmonary resuscitation. Since the patient has dementia, she is incompetent to make decisions. Due to lack of mental abilities, others may view her life not worth living and be better off dead. Instead of saving, some will do nothing to allow the patient to die. It is morally wrong. However, there are exemptions. It may be unethical to shorten human life but it is acceptable if the purpose of not resuscitating is to alleviate suffering and benefit the patient. Also, if further treatment is futile and will only give excessive burden to the patient; then withdrawing treatment is acceptable (Keown, p 46).
My friend’s experience is another form of euthanasia. Her grandmother was a dialysis patient for almost 20 years. One day his appendix was ruptured and need to undergo appendectomy. The surgery was successful. While she was recovering, he suddenly had a cardiac arrest. She survived from the attack but it resulted her being on a comatose stage. The ventilator was the only means to stay alive. Doctor’s finding was that the patient’s heart was calcified due to long-term dialysis. A year passed, still no sign of improvement. For this reason, the doctor suggested to get her off the ventilator. It was a very difficult decision for the family. They wanted to prolong her life as much as possible. The family even asked for second opinions from other physicians, yet still received the same suggestions. Finally, the family decided to put her grandmother to rest.
The other two examples have a similar concept. Judging the person worthless due to mental conditions devalues a human’s life. Having disabilities or being unconscious does not mean they do not have the right to live. However, if future treatment is unnecessary and useless and that no other medicines or treatments could restore nor improve the person’s condition; then withdrawing life-sustaining treatments is acceptable and legal.
Based on the examples presented, Euthanasia can be acceptable under some circumstances. Euthanasia may involve taking a human’s life, but not all forms of killing are murder. Therefore, we must not conclude that euthanasia is completely wrong. To respect the value of life does not also mean that we have to prolong their suffering or shorten a person’s life. Our goal is to comfort the dying person and lessen their suffering as much as possible, even if such act is the cause of death. Yet at the same time, we must also abide the law. Being open-minded and considering all the issues surrounding the patient’s condition would help us determine if keeping a patient alive is the best option or may opt to euthanasia.

Works Cited
Gupta, Deepak, Sushma Bhatnagar, and Seema Mishra. "Euthanasia: Issues Implied Within."
Internet Journal of Pain, Symptom Control & Palliative Care 4.2 (2006): 1. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 16 Nov. 2010.
Keown, John. “Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy: An Argument Against Legalization”.
Cambridge University Press, (Apr. 2002). Web. 16 Nov. 2010
Mitchell, Kay. "An interview with Lesley Martin." International Journal of Palliative Nursing
10.5 (2004): 218-224. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 16 Nov. 2010.
Somerville, Margaret A. “Death Talk: The Case Against Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted
Suicide.” McGill-Queen’s University Press, (2001). Web 16 Nov. 2010
"What Is Euthanasia (assisted Suicide)? What Is The Definition Of Assisted Suicide Or Euthanasia?" Medical News Today: Health News. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Nov. 2010.

Categories: 1

0 Replies to “Euthanasia Pros And Cons Essay”

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *